The Debate Of Online Gambling In The US Goes On
The state of California there is a bill that’s trying to make it way to legalize online gambling intrastate. The Morongo Tribe and several card clubs have joined forces to push the bill in the financially desperate state however it really doesn’t seem likely to get a good chance before September 11, 2009
According to the newspaper Capitol Weekly, Senator Darrel Steinberg (a Democrat from Sacramento) believes there is not enough time to do the bill justice. “I think it’s going to take more than four weeks to analyze that kind of proposal and the potential economic benefits,†said Steinberg.
One of the big factors pushing tribes that have lined-up against the Morongo group is the bill’s shift away from an exclusive gambling pact with the state that has enabled the tribes to run land-based gaming ventures within California. In addition to the Pechanga group, the California Tribal Business Alliance (CTBA), which represents the Viejas Band of Kumeyaay Indians and the Pala Band of Mission Indians are all against the Morongo bill. Read the story here.
This debate stems from the release of the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act in 2006 which effected many companies whose business was online gambling. The law is meant to protect citizens from getting into trouble which usually is associated with gambling. It’s funny how a country that is democratic doesn’t think it’s citizens can control themselves enough to monitor how they spend their money…
Sure, some people may need some guidance and also there is plenty of reasons to be worried about scams however the majority of online gambling is run by businesses looking to provide value while making a profit. The money is not to be made in screwing your customers so why would they promote such a thing?
The debate of online gambling is still one that will probably go on for quite some time. While you’re waiting why no pick up a few nice clay poker chips and get a private game going on? ;)
Filed under: Uncategorized | No Comments »
